|
Giret A., Tourpin S., Marc S., Verdier O. & Cottin J.Y. (2002). Volcanisme de l'Ile des Pingouins, Archipel Crozet, témoin de l'hétérogénéité du manteau fertile au sud de l'Océan Indien. Comptes Rendus de Géoscience, 334, 481–488.
|
|
|
Rochette P., Sagnotti L., Consolmagno G., Folco L., Maras A., Panzarino F., Pesonen L., Serra R. & Terho M. (2001). A database of magnetic susceptibility of stony meteorites. Quaderni di Geofisica – Quaderni Geofisc, , 30.
|
|
|
Dubroca L., Guinet C., André J.M., Ben Mustapha S., Lea M.A. & Bonadonna F. (2001). Distribution des prédateurs marins supérieurs en fonction des paramètres océanographiques mesurés et simulés : cas des otaries antarctiques (Arctocephalus gazella) à Kerguelen, et du rorqual commun (Balaenoptera physalus) en Méditerranée. Océanis, 27, 83–100.
|
|
|
Koudil M. & Guinet C. (1998). Relation entre le phénomène El Niño et la reproduction du pétrel bleu (Halobaena carulea) à Kerguelen. Océanis, 24(3), 199–206.
|
|
|
Pontier D., Fromont E. & Say L. (2001). Le chat dans l’écosystème antarctique. Pour la science, , 51.
|
|
|
Brossard T. & Joly D. (2004). Modèles spatiaux à grande échelle en climatologie : exemple de la température et du vent au front des glaciers Loven (Svalbard). Bulletin de l'association des géographes français, 2003-4, 355–361.
|
|
|
Griselin M. & Ormaux S. (2004). Le paysage et ses temporalités en baie du Roi, Svalbard. Bulletin de l'association des géographes français, 2003, 386–393.
|
|
|
Mercier D. (2003). Glaciaire, paraglaciaire, périglaciaire : relais et combinaisons de processus. Bulletin de l'association des géographes français, 4, 349–354.
|
|
|
Moreau M. (2003). La reconquête végétale des marges libérées des glaces depuis la fin du Petit Age Glaciaire, Spitsberg (presqu'île de Brogger). Bulletin de l'association des géographes français, 4, 377–385.
|
|
|
Bonadonna F., Villafane M., Bajzak C. & Jouventin P. (2004). Recognition of burrow’s olfactory signature in blue petrels, Halobaena caerulea: an efficient discrimination mechanism in the dark. Animal behaviour, 67, 893–898.
Abstract: Previous work has shown that blue petrels need olfaction to home. We investigated whether they also recognize an olfactory signature of their own nest. We performed T-maze experiments in which maze arms were connected with the subject bird’s burrow and with the burrow of a conspecific neighbour. Of 23 birds, 16 were able to recognize the arm leading to their own burrow. In a second experiment, we positioned the maze in front of the subject’s burrow but the maze arms were closed and did not enter the burrow. Consequently, no burrow odours could be sensed by the bird. In this case, 85% of birds (17 of 20) failed to choose, suggesting that petrels were not motivated to choose by positional cues in the absence of odour
cues. We explored this idea further by performing a homing experiment whereby homing birds had to relocate an artificially displaced burrow entrance. Blue petrels homed, ignoring the natural burrow entrance and using the new artificial one. The ability to smell their own burrow allows blue petrels to return to the colony at night and to find the correct nest.
Programme: 354
|
|